Review is more than a search box. The platform gives the legal team a full workspace organized around the case - what the record says, what helps, what hurts, and what is still missing.
Ask the Record
Ask questions in plain language and get answers grounded strictly in the record, with numbered citations that click through to the full stored text and the original file. Conversations are saved as named sessions the whole team can return to. And on any page, selecting a passage - including inside an open document - starts a conversation anchored to exactly that text.
The Case at a Glance
- Dashboard - live counts of what was received, catalogued, processed, and coded, plus a needs-attention list.
- Chronology - an AI-assembled, dated timeline, every event citing its source documents, filterable by claim and regenerable as the corpus grows.
- Truth table - a per-allegation scorecard of documents that support, contradict, or are neutral on each theory, with one-click drill-down.
- Entity graph - an interactive map of the people and companies in the record, connected by the documents they share.
Know Your Documents - Both Kinds
The hot documents queue ranks the flagged smoking-gun material, filterable by whether it helps or hurts. The adverse documents briefing makes sure you know your bad documents before opposing counsel does: everything coded as harmful, with the damaging quotes, a why-it-hurts rationale, party-admission flags, and confidence levels. The evidence log collects every productive document, filterable by claim, theory, bearing, and hot status.
Humans Stay in Control
- Contribute to the case. Attorneys, clients, and staff can float ideas on any page. The assistant critically evaluates each idea against the record and gives a plain verdict - and nothing enters the case file until a human explicitly approves it.
- Team feedback threads. Shared discussions on each claim; AI proposals land on the page only after an explicit Apply confirmation, recorded under the confirming reviewer's login.
- Attorney package. The complete case work product as a single court-styled document with clickable citations, exportable to PDF and Word.
- Draft privilege log. Generated from metadata only - never from privileged content - with one-click CSV export.
Works Together With
- AI Issue CodingEvery document coded for issues, helpful or harmful bearing, privilege, key quotes, entities, amounts, and dated facts.
- Hybrid SearchSemantic and keyword search fused and reranked, with the custodian, date, and issue filters that discovery questions actually take.
- Bates ProductionReview decisions to a served, Bates-numbered package with a fail-closed privilege gate and a verifiable manifest.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I know a chat answer is not made up?
Every answer is grounded strictly in the record and carries numbered citations. Each citation clicks through to the full stored text and the original file, so verification is one click, not an act of faith.
Can the AI change the case file on its own?
Never. The assistant can evaluate ideas and propose additions, but nothing enters the case until a human explicitly approves it. Approvals are recorded under the approving reviewer, and retractions are kept in the audit trail rather than deleted.
Can the whole team work in the workspace together?
Yes. Case chat sessions are saved and named for the team to return to, and each claim carries shared discussion threads. Proposals land on a strategy page only after an explicit Apply confirmation recorded under the confirming login.
Can I get the work product out of the platform?
Yes. The attorney package assembles the case work product as a single court-styled document with clickable citations, exportable to PDF and Word. The draft privilege log exports to CSV.